Another week, a few more films. I have already started the April Film Project, I just haven't written any of them up yet, because I am a slacker. But hey, 5 movies this week! That's pretty good right?
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
Halloween
Jane Eyre
Heartland
Thor: The Dark World
There's what I wrote up the last week. Sorry for the short post, but I'm a boring person by nature. I hope you have a great week!
FYI: The title for this post comes from my nephew Jack. So blame him.
My reviews of recent movies, the occasional social commentary, and perhaps some other projects I cook up.
Search This Blog
Sunday, April 6, 2014
Saturday, April 5, 2014
Review: Thor: The Dark World
Thor: The
Dark World (2013):
Synopsis – Thor has been cleaning up the 9 realms and
making everything cool again, when suddenly (!) a new threat appears in the
form of a dark elf who is hell-bent on returning the universe to a state of
total darkness.
Starring - Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, Christopher Eccleston, Rene Russo, Stellan Skarsgard, all kinds of people.
I don’t know what
it is about the Thor movies, but I really like both of them. Something about
the clash of cultures between the scientists and the Gods just tickles my funny
bone in the right way. And for some reason whenever Kat Dennings says something
I cannot help but laugh! She is great at delivering lines.
What’s that? This
isn’t supposed to be a comedy? Listen, if this had just been a straight action
movie, then why would I have bothered watching it? In almost every Marvel movie
that’s been released, the minute I stopped caring is the minute the action got
turned up to 11. I’m a weirdo, what can I say. This movie has a fair amount of
action, but it really is mostly a comedic movie, containing different levels of
the “fish out of water” troupe and snarkiness. So I can see why some people
didn’t like it, and I don’t fault them their opinions. I loved it.
What I Liked:
-This movie made me laugh, a lot. Whether it was Loki
quipping, Kat Denning quipping, or even Natalie Portman quipping, for some
reason the humor of the movie was right up my alley. And of course, an action
movie where people are thrown around is bound to have some physical humor. All
of which worked for me. Lastly, there is the funniest thing in the movie in my
opinion…
-Stellan Skarsgard is fantastic in this movie. If you
haven’t seen it, I don’t want to spoil his first scene, but I was laughing so
hard I was crying. Imagine the guy from Good Will Hunting, now doing the performance
that this film required. Every bit
with him was great in an already super fun movie.
-As a Marvel comics nerd, I have to say that the stingers at
the end of the movie made me so happy. Both the one that hinted toward the Guardians
of the Galaxy movie, and the one that put a nice bow on Thor: The Dark
World were magical to me.
What I Didn’t
Like:
-Everything did feel kind of rushed, plot-wise at least. I
suppose the studios thought they couldn’t hold the audience’s attention for a
longer movie in Thor-land, but I totally disagree. I would have loved a longer
sequence of Natalie Portman’s character walking around with Thor in Asgard and
interacting with different Gods and demi-Gods, but I’m a nerd, so there’s that
to consider. Also, a little more fleshing out of the villain couldn’t have
hurt.
-SPOILER: They
kill off one of the characters, and it ends up feeling very halfhearted. It
really doesn’t even work as motivation for the other characters. It was just a
way for one of the actors to exit from any other film obligations.
What I Hated:
-I hate that it ended.
Verdict:
A fun blockbuster action movie, this movie is a quick watch
that is totally enjoyable. Pop it in the player when you want to have a good
time. I intend to buy a copy.
Friday, April 4, 2014
Review: Heartland
Heartland (1979):
Synopsis – A
glimpse of the life of a woman and her daughter who move to Wyoming to work for
a cattle farmer in the 1910’s.
The final
movie in my March Movie Project, I certainly saved one of the best
for last. My mom has always loved the Little House on the Prairie book
series. She read it several times through when she was a lass, and when she was
raising my siblings and I, she read it to us too. I can remember both mom and
dad regaling me with the tales of Laura Ingalls as I drifted off to sleep at
bedtime. Because of my mom’s love for those books, she latched on to a few films
that showed the life she had read so often about. One of them was this movie, Heartland.
Out of the films she picked for me, she really wanted me to see this movie the
most, and it was almost impossible to get a copy. Basically, through Amazon, we
had to pay a high price for someone to print us a copy of the DVD. We got our
copy just before the end of the month and watched it together. My mom loves
this movie, I love my mom, and now I also love this movie. Here are some
thoughts on it:
What I Liked:
-It’s a very
simple movie and I really liked that. Naturally there are certain complications
in the character’s lives, such as dealing with the low price of cattle and a having
a baby in the dead of winter, but there are plot points made larger than the
others that movie can be defined by. What we got was a slice of life from this
time period, showing a woman and a man (and a child, but they child is almost
inconsequential to the story) living life in a rural setting before things like
electricity, telephones, or automobiles were common place. They struggle for
what they want, and really everything they try to accomplish is a struggle
because nothing in this movie comes without hard work. It was moving to watch,
and a bit inspiring.
-Conchata
Ferrell was very good in her role as a poor woman who finds herself and her
child suddenly in the middle of nowhere working with a man who is difficult to
communicate with. Rip Torn was something else entirely. I DID NOT RECOGNIZE
HIM. He absolutely transforms into his character, using an accent and changing
his mannerism into a tough man who is used to a tough life, a man who won’t
take no guff. It wasn’t until halfway through the movie when they showed a
close-up of his face that I began to puzzle away at who I was looking at. “I
know that guy” I thought. HIS NAME WAS IN THE OPENING CREDITS AND I STILL DID
NOT PUT THIS TOGETHER. Really, an amazing performance.
What I Didn’t
Like:
-There is an
old woman, played by Lilia Skala, who shows up a few times in the
movie and talks with Conchata about whatever. She has a thick accent and is
almost impossible to understand most of the time. It wouldn’t be a problem if
she was just someone who showed up and then left real quickly, but she has a
lot of speaking scenes. And it even seems like she is speaking slower on
purpose to make herself easier to understand, but it does not help in the
least.
What I Hated:
-My mother
didn’t remember this stuff, but there are some really brutal scenes of animal
mutilation. I say mutilation, because that’s what it is to me, but what I mean
is we see some cows branded and at least one that is castrated with a POCKET
KNIFE. Maybe this is perfectly normal; I wouldn’t know, I’m a California boy.
Oh yeah, and they kill a pig with a shot gun, and it is not fake in any way.
Just a little too real for my taste.
Verdict:
I know I just listed
a couple of negatives there, but I am still really happy I own this movie now.
It will serve to me as a reminder of a time passed by and how lucky I am. It is
also a very solid little film, and if you have a way to see it I think you
should. I apologize if the animal bits are very upsetting for you. I intend to
rewatch this movie many times.
Thursday, April 3, 2014
Review: Jane Eyre (2011)
Jane Eyre (2011):
Synopsis – A
young woman takes a job as a governess at a castle (?) owned by a total jerk
face who bullies her into love. I may have added my own flair to part of the
story.
Starring - Mia Wasikowska, Michael Fassbender, Jamie Bell, Judi Dench, Sally Hawkins, a whole bunch of others, all doing
good stuff.
Sarah’s love
for period pieces tends to lead us out to the theater in pursuit of whatever
new ones come out. Recently we saw In Secret which was pretty bad, but most of the time we are at least mostly satisfied
by what we see. Jane Eyre is one of Sarah’s favorite movies, and I stand
by that choice 100 percent. It is up there with the best looking movies in
recent memory, but so much more.
What I Liked:
-The
cinematography is amazing in this film. Along with the set design and
costuming, you cannot help but truly be transported to the world of the movie.
Cary Fukunaga may be a magical imp that carried over his powers to the TV
series True Detective, because that looks just as good. They must do
something to the film to tone down the colors, because everything is somewhat
bleak and grayish in quality. It is still a beautiful piece of work to behold.
-Mia
Wasikowski knocks this performance out of the park. She plays Jane Eyre as calm
and smart, never taking it to any place over-dramatic, even though it would
seem perfectly logical to do so. I mean, Jane Eyre has had a hard and mostly
terrible life! A lesser actress would use that motivation as an excuse for
hamming up the role, attempting to squeeze pity out of the audience any way
they can. Wasikowski’s Jane has been made into a hardened and suspicious woman,
not ready to trust anyone, not afraid to speak her mind when prompted to. She
is no delicate flower and that is perfect.
What I Didn’t
Like:
-If I have
one complaint, it is how attractive Michael Fassbender is. I haven’t actually
read Jane Eyre, but from what I have heard about it I understand that Mr.
Rochester is supposed to be unattractive not only in manner but in appearance.
I am a straight man, but even I cannot believe for one second that women would
not fall all over themselves in order to get at Mr. Fassbender. Some dudes’
just got all the right stuff in the face area. He’s a great actor though, so I
wouldn’t want him removed from the film. Maybe some prosthetics to ugg him up?
What I Hated:
-Nothing.
Verdict:
If you want a
beautiful looking drama that features great acting, you really can’t go wrong.
There are a few moments that drag, but that’s what you get from gothic
literature. Totally worth watching.
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
Review: Halloween (1978)
Halloween (1978):
Synopsis – A crazy dude escapes from a mental hospital after
years of being incarcerated, only to return to the town where he had killed his
older sister, beginning a new spree of terror. He is totes cray cray!
Starring – Donald Pleasence, Jamie Lee Curtis, Nancy Kyes, P.J. Soles, Charles Cyphers, the guy who played
Michael Myers, the kids, and the rest of the cast!
As I have said previously, I never used to watch horror
movies. I think the first time I was exposed to any horror movie was when I was
between the ages of 7-9. I was staying over at an older boy’s house, having a
sleepover with all his friends, and they were having a horror movie marathon. I
don’t know what Nightmare on Elm Street movie this is from, but I
remember 2 things: One, Freddy saying “Let’s suck face” and then sucking on a
girl’s mouth till she became a hollow husk; two, a giant Freddy head attached
to a thick neck, like a huge worm, eating a girl who was in her bed. The rest of the time I had my eyes closed shut
very tightly. Whether these two scenes actually exist in any movie I don’t
know; I haven’t bothered to seek them out to confirm their existence. Needless
to say, those images became burned into my brain and while I don’t remember
having any nightmares I certainly haven’t forgotten the exposure over the
years. It started in me a fascination with things that go bump in the night
which never carried over into movies until recently. I can remember sitting in
the school library, reading Stephen King or looking through this awesome
encyclopedia of monsters they had. Over
the last couple of years, I have been delving slowly into the horror genre of
film, generally staying away from any movie that I know is only about jump
scares; because if I’m going to be scared I want it to be a genuine feeling. A
dog barking at you randomly as you walk by is the same as a jump scare, and
there’s nothing terrifying about that after the fact. Halloween has been
sitting on my shelf for a while now, and I finally decided it was time to get
it over. The funny thing to me is, the only reason I wanted to watch it right
when I did is because I had just finished Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
and wanted something slightly schlocky to balance out the joy. I got what I
needed, but it wasn’t as good as I had hoped.
What I Liked:
-Michael Myers, what’s not to like? They did a great job of
making a guy in a mask seem super creepy. His slow and measured movements and muteness
(with shots from within the mask, accompanied by breathing) were an excellent
choice by the film makers. Nothing seems more alien than something that is
alive but cannot be communicated with.
-I heard a lot about Donald Pleasence’s role in this movie
and how he is amazing. While I think amazing might be a bit strong, it’s only
because he isn’t really given much to do except run around explaining things.
He is definitely the best actor in this film.
What I Didn’t Like:
-What the hell? If those are teenagers, then I’m a freaking
teenager! Even Jamie Lee Curtis, who was actually the appropriate age during
the filming of the movie, seems much older because of her voice. And when
combined with those two ladies pretending not to be in their 30’s next, well,
it comes off as pretty damn false.
-Everyone knows the theme from Halloween. It is iconic for a
reason, and it really is perfect for the film. After a while though, I got
pretty tired of the digital score just popping in randomly. I was jarred out of
the movie a few times by it. I don’t think I like digital scores as a rule.
What I Hated:
-I was very much enjoying how Michael Myers seemed both very
human (driving a car, being seen all over town but not just magically appearing
everywhere) and very monster (silent, slow moving, strong, determined like the
freaking terminator) at the same time. But when he begins to take a lot of
hits, they don’t seem to slow him down at all. He comes off as nearly
invincible by the end, especially with the ambiguous disappearance at the end.
I thought that was preeeeety lame.
Verdict:
I think I might have had higher expectations for Halloween
than I thought I did. It’s my friend Jose’s fault. He has been talking it up
for a while. Well, and so has the rest of the internet. Either way, I am glad I
watched, and I would watch it again if pressed to, but it really wasn’t
anything too special.
Review: Sunrise A Song of Two Humans
Sunrise: A
Song of Two Humans (1927):
Synopsis – A
man who has grown tired of his life plots with a woman (from the city no less)
to murder his wife and sell the farm! We’ve all been there right? Right?
Silent film
continues to blow me away. I watch these masterpieces and remember that little
shit I used to be, the one who said “all black and white movies are boring.” I
don’t think that is too uncommon an opinion in the age I grew up in, and I
wouldn’t be surprised if something extremely similar someday slips from the
mouth of one of my nieces or nephews. Now, I cannot believe how much I’ve been
missing. This movie was so amazing it might jump straight up into my top 10 list.
An hour and a half silent film that ran my emotions through the ringer more
than once! I am so happy I watched this movie, and I cannot wait to force it
upon my friends.
What I Liked:
-I cannot get
over how masterfully the plot of the movie is handled. So much story is conveyed
in the actors faces and movements, in the scenery and the score (I don’t know
if it’s a faux-pas to mention the score of a silent film, but the one on the
YouTube version I watched was AMAZING), and in the subtle use of title cards
during the movie. The joyfulness of the second act of the film somehow made me
forget the heinous acts of the man in the first act. And even when the third
act on the boat trip home is set up so obviously, I could not help but be riveted
because of my investment in the characters.
-The copy of
the film looks amazing. I watched an HD version that was on YouTube for free,
and it was like being transported into a theater and seeing it as a brand new
release. The effects used in the movie are all complimentary and pretty
astonishing in context to the time period. Or maybe they aren’t! I am not
familiar enough with film from the time period yet to make that call. I was just
blown away by what can only be called movie magic. The use of super-imposed
screens to show what was being imagined and the sets that truly gave the
illusion of the locations they portrayed (farmland, city, a fair!) were
perfect. Absolutely perfect.
What I Didn’t
Like and What I Hated:
-This movie
is as close to perfect as you can get.
Verdict:
When I
break-down a film, and both the “didn’t like” and “hate” sections are empty, I’m
sure can guess how I felt about the film in the end (although sometimes the
complaints are so minor they just don’t bare worth mentioning). This film is a
masterpiece through and through. And you know what? It’s available to watch FOR
FREE on YouTube right now! If you have any interest in silent film that isn’t a
straight comedy, please check this movie out.
Monday, March 31, 2014
March Week 4: The Post Commandments
Whoops, a
rare occurrence happened yesterday. I completely forgot that it was Sunday. I
guess I got too caught up in reviewing Noah to remember the one real thing I
actually require myself to do on the weekend. Eh, no big deal. How’s everybody
doing? Me? Oh, you know, still looking for work. I had been trying to set up
some ads on the blog, because I will take money where I can get it at this
point, but Google AdSense kept denying my application because of “Copyrighted
Material.” So, if for some crazy reason you were to go back through the
archives, you would notice that I took down all the pretty pictures and videos
in order to appease these weirdos. But, it was of no use. Even after removing
all of that content I was still being rejected. So screw it, back to putting
pictures up. Adventures in blogging amirite? Here’s what I watched last week:
I am still
playing catch up on reviews. I’m missing one for Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans,
Halloween (1978), and Heartland, which I just watched and will be the last in
the March
Project movies. I was really considering taking this week off from film,
finishing my reviews and reading a book or two, but I am so excited for the April
2014 Film Project that I don’t think I can wait to get started! For April,
I will be watching the best rated films (according to the Letterboxd community) of the 1970’s, which I
haven’t seen yet. That list is sooooo cool. We’ll see how far I get with this
project.
I hope you
all have a good week. I’m planning to.
Joel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




